Not enough, maybe, but at least Congress has started to do something about the deceptive credit card industry. Now it is time for it to tackle an ever growing menace known as the payday loan industry and especially the online payday loan industry.
If you are interested, Huffpo has a post on the subject, we review here, and the site is looking for your horror stories as well. You can email those payday horror stories to Huffpo at this email address -
submissions+debt@huffingtonpost.com
What Huffpo reported was that the online payday lending industry group, Online Lenders Alliance, wrapped up a 3-day conference near the White House, where they pandered to
senators and congressmen from both parties. Or, maybe, the pandering was the other way around.
Regardless, the purpose of the OLA is to weed out the bad apples of the industry by requiring its members, none of which are listed on its website, to comply with good business practices. But, you know, good business practices do not always represent moral or even consumer friendly practices. You can be a loan shark and still account for your profits appropriately. Also, not many payday lenders promote themselves as being part of the OLA.
What is obvious, however, is that online payday loans are becoming more of the norm. Online payday loan lenders loaned (?) approximately $7.1
billion in volume for 2008 according to one estimate.
Consumer advocates sent a letter to members of Congress urging them to ignore the conference and implement a cap on interest
rates. There point was that online payday loans are layering a
whole other set of risks on top of a product that is set to fail by its
basic structure.
As quoted in the article, Dale Pittman, a consumer protection lawyer who represents victims of
debt collection harassment and abuse in Petersburg, Va., has some
experience tracking online lenders. He said, "It's hard as hell to find these people ... You can't communicate with them and tell them what they're doing
is illegal." Thirty-five states have enacted interest caps that
effectively ban payday lending, but Virginia isn't one of them and so online payday loan lenders are avoiding these caps. Pittman tried to track down several online lenders on behalf of a
client who was drowning in debt after taking out multiple payday loans
over the course of a year. None of the lenders had a license, as far as
Pittman could tell, so all the loans were illegal. He also could not find but one of the lenders.
The same problem is occurring in a bankruptcy setting. Whether or not it is an automatic stay or discharge injunction violation to submit an actual check for payment on an account which was issued before the filing of the bankruptcy, most of these lenders no longer accept actual negotiable instruments. Not only do these payday sharks ding bank accounts all of the time, but if they recover money that money will likely have to be returned if any turnover adversary is filed. But, try to find the company. The bank statements are not much help. Usually the trail is so difficult to uncover and the potential recovery is small enough that most bankruptcy attorneys do not believe it is worth their time, especially if they cannot recover attorneys fees if no stay violation is found. The debtor in bankruptcy, however, is made to suffer.
Recent Comments