10th Circuits Adopts Objective-Coercion Principle In Discharge Injunction Violations
The United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit opened the door to the Objective-Coercion Principle in discharge injunction violations. In doing so, however, it distinguished the facts of the case at hand and ruled against the debtors because neither the Bankruptcy Court findings, nor the Debtor's testimony met the guidelines set out by the 10th Circuit.
In the case In re Paul, Circuit Judge Stephen H. Anderson issued the opinion that states that the Objective-Coercion Principle "operates as an overarching exception" to the rule that actions that do not directly violate the 11 U.S.C. §524 discharge injunction may still be a violation of §524(a)(2) if it can be shown that a "creditor acted in such a way as to 'coerce' or "harass' the debtor improperly so as to theoretically force them to pay a discharged debt.
The 10th Circuit, therefore, adopts the theory first established by the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals in its decision In re Pratt in 2006, except that the 10th Circuit did not find that the facts before it in In re Paul met the standard set.









Recent Comments